Horizontal Heavens Observatory "...From  A Galaxy Far, Far Away"
Clear Sky Chart  

This page was last updated on 10/08/14.


FOR SALE 10in Meade LX200 EMC

About  Horizontal Mike

Horizontal Hell

Planetary Nebula Discovery



Clear Dark Sky Charts

Local Links

Analysis Page

The Woodshop

Wood Working Links

Old Navy Pics 1974




Comets ISS Shuttle Flyovers etc



Moon Images


Eclipsing Infrared Binary

Yerkes Observatory

Texas Weather

Birds & Critters

M42 Orion Nebula


NGC2261 + NGC2264 Nebula



MoonLite Focuser

Photometrics Cooler

Flocking LX200R

LiteBox for Flats

CCD Inspector Page

DEC Motor Modifications

Dovetail Mounting Details

Focal Reducer Information

LXD55 Mount Mods

Meade Superwedge Modifications


05/09/2014 Storm Damage



Not So Par-Focal Filters -

 When I first started monochrome filtered imaging, I purchased an entire LRGB, Ha, SII, OIII set of Astrodon's Tru-Balance "Par-Focal" filters in order to make my transition from DSLR to chilled CCDs much easier and to shorten my learning curve with my new ST-10XME w/CFW10 imager.  For the most part I have to admit, I was impressed with my newly acquired level of imaging and using what I was told were "par-focal" filters.  After 2 years of experience with CCD imaging, I continued to look for ways to improve each of my images.  The more I paid attention, the more I began to realize that not all of my color filtered sub-frames were as par-focal as I first assumed.  Understanding that not all refractors were equal in color correction, I replaced my Orion 80ED with high-end APOs (a .990 Strehl Ratio TMB80/480 and a Televue NP-127 Apochromatic Refractors).  However, I continued to notice the focus disparity and finally decided to try and quantify it this during August 2007.

Below is a comparison of TWO focus routines I used to record a set of RGB images of the Trifid Nebula M20:

  1. Par-Focal Focusing Routine - Focused only using the Luminance filter and set CCDSoft to record a color series of 5min RGBs (Sequence = RGB, RGB, RGB, etc.).  Refocusing after every one degree drop in Celsius.

  2. Filter Specific Focusing Routine - Focused using Blue filter, image all Blue sub-frames refocusing as temperature dropped, repeated focusing and imaging procedure with Green and then Red filters.


  •  Seeing was roughly equal at 3/5 on both nights (8/6-7/2007 and 8/8-9/2007)

  •  Transparency was slightly poorer during second imaging session of 8/8-9/2007

  •  Target imaged at same time, location and with same equipment (ST-10XME w/CFW10 on NP-127 on MI250 mount) as well as same temperatures, both ambient air temperatures and equal CCD cooling set-points.


  •  Blue sub-frames went from an average 4.82" FWHM with Luminance par-focal focusing to 3.0" FWHM with filter specific focusing

  •  Green sub-frames went from an average 3.3" FWHM with Luminance par-focal focusing to 3.08" FWHM with filter specific focusing

  •  Red sub-frames went from an average 3.57" FWHM with Luminance par-focal focusing to 3.0" FWHM with filter specific focusing



  • There appears to be a filter induced focus shift across the visible spectrum moving from lower frequencies (Red) through higher (Blue) frequencies when using these purported "Par-Focal" filters when using the par-focal focusing routine referenced above.

  • Current filter off-sets with Lum = 0, R = +9, G = +1, B = -23 when using my FeatherTouch motorized focuser.

  •  FWHM measurements of filter specific focusing routine are nearly identical at 103% greatest variation, however, the par-focal focusing routine shows 146% greatest variation when each imaging night is looked at separately.

  •  BOTTOM LINE - The "par-focal" filters I purchased are NOT par-focal on my NP-127. 

  •  It is possible that this may be partially telescope design induced, due to color correction characteristics of Apochromatic Refractors

  • On the other hand, one would think that filter sets being marketed as "par-focal" would take into account the varied color correcting abilities between telescopes -- Either that or quit marketing them as "par-focal."

  • UPDATE -- It looks like my filter's manufacturer has finally updated his marketing to explain why his filters are not "par-focal" in all telescope designs.  Thank you.  It sure would have been nice to know this when I bought my FIRST filters for CCD imaging.  I have at least 2yr of poor imaging from trying to use them as par-focal filters that show my frustrations.  Now that I finally know better, I focus each filter independently.